Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl UPDATE 3 [PATCH]
От | Alex Hunsaker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl UPDATE 3 [PATCH] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34d269d41002011853j89d506bp1f07ef377a480d2e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl UPDATE 3 [PATCH] (Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl
UPDATE 3 [PATCH]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 03:58, Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 06:38:59PM -0700, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > >> plc_safe_ok.pl seems to loose its CVS $PostgreSQL$ keyword. >Probably a slip-up when I merged the changes from HEAD up through my >chain of branches. Can you send an updated patch? I think Andrew will probably fix it up anyway but better safe than sorry. >> That being said *im* ok with it. Its useful from a debug standpoint. > > Yes. And, as I mentioned previously, I expect people like myself, David > Wheeler, and others to experiment with the undocumented functionality > and define and document a good API to it for the 9.1 release. Huh, I missed that. > I'd much rather get this change in than shoot for a larger change that > doesn't get committed due to long-running discussions. (Which seems > more likely as Andrew's going to be less available for the rest of the > commitfest.) Plus its hard to get people to agree on anything GUCy (my new favorite pun) thats not well thought out and tested. Anyway yes I agree, but I thought I should at least raise it for discussion. You'll notice the patch has been marked "Ready for Commiter" this whole time. =)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: