Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:03, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.

After skimming the thread Bruce linked:http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-04/msg00512.php

It certainly seems "insufficiently-thought-out".  :(