Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34DBC472.8ABE81FA@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0 (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > Yes, I think to change atttypmod to default to -1 would be the right > > > > thing, > > > > since the empty string '' really has a length of 0, > > > > We could think of -1 as: We don't know how long this field will be. > > > > 0 would mean the field has 0 bytes. > > > > > > Do people want atttypmod at -1 at this time? It will require a > > > dump/reload. > > > > If it fixes problems, now is the time :) > > Well, right now, since it is not being used from anything by char() and > varchar(), it is not a problem. But it will have to be changed when we > use it for other types. > > So do we change it now? If it make things more self-consistant, now is the time :) I would consider all of this related to or a followup on the char/varchar work done earlier. - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: