Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database?
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34D91B48.61992D5A@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I have gram.y patches to do this. No visible effect on the regression execution speed, > > which thanks to Bruce is on my machine down to a record 2:23 elapsed execution time; > > the last speeds were in the 2:31 range. > > > > I'm planning on bumping the gram.y cvs version to 2.0 for this change, due to the > > _large_ number of accumulated improvements. Any objections? > > Go ahead. Are there security problems? Security problems with the patch? No, I don't think so. The only thing I'm doing is implementing xlateSqlFunc() similarly to the existing xlateSqlType(), and defining a "func_name" state in place of just "name" which was used before. The only downside is that backend functions implemented with names "char_length" and "character_length" will be masked by the parser translation so cannot be executed. In this case I think that is OK, but I should put something in the new docs about that :) - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: