Re: PL/R regression on windows, but not linux with master.
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/R regression on windows, but not linux with master. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3492e360-d198-b525-6ae7-05a8d098b050@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/R regression on windows, but not linux with master. (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/R regression on windows, but not linux with master.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/11/21 12:51 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 at 12:43, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us > <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote: > > I wrote: > > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com <mailto:mail@joeconway.com>> writes: > >> Would an equivalent "PGWARNING" be something we are open to adding and > >> back-patching? > > > It's not real obvious how pl/r could solve this in a reliable way > > otherwise, so adding that would be OK with me, but I wonder whether > > back-patching is going to help you any. You'd still need to compile > > against older headers I should think. So I'd suggest > > (1) add PGWARNING in HEAD only > > Concretely, maybe like the attached? > > > +1 from me. > I especially like the changes to the comments as it's more apparent what they > should be used for. +1 Looks great to me. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: