Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
От | Pavel Raiskup |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3492059.LKk05KFoD2@nb.usersys.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435) (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Vladimir, I'm kindly reconstructing the way-too-much trimmed conversation in this thread: Vladimir wrote: > Pavel R. wrote: > > Vladimir wrote: > > > Pavel K. wrote: > > > > Vladimir wrote: > > > > > Pavel K. wrote: > > > > > > Here [1] is my pull request > > > > > > > > > > How does it address 'fedora no internet' problem? > > > > > > > > All required maven dependencies are BuildDependencies in spec file. > > > > > > > > It means that everything is in fedora repositories in form of RPMS. > > > > > > > > So all maven dependencies are downloaded before build. > > > > > > > > This solves problem with missing waffle. > > > > > > Why do you need #495 change then? > > > > You are asking why we don't add waffle into Fedora? The Windows specific > > 'jar' files can't be distributed in Fedora, most probably neither built > > from source on/for Fedora. But please, substitute Fedora with any open > > source GNU/Linux distribution, > > No. I am not. > > I am asking: "can you kindly provide a build log of a failed due to > waffle build?" > In other words, "a fedora build log before #495, and a fedora build > log after #495 is merged in". > > Alternative: can you provide a test case that *fails* without #495? > > Unfortunately, current #495 has no tests behind. All tests pass > without #495, thus the change does almost nothing. Those questions sound much more concrete ;). Pavel, can we provide failed build logs or other info? I've posted issues with maven in this thread [1], I bet with waffle it is similar situation -- from quick look at Pavel's -- it looks he tries to make the waffle "optional" dependancy -- but I haven't done review. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4027547.QFGZ3nUSVM@nb.usersys.redhat.com Pavel
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: