Re: Index build temp files
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Index build temp files |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3487.1357769394@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Index build temp files (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Index build temp files
Re: Index build temp files |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 9 January 2013 21:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If we were designing this from scratch I'd agree that a separate TEMP
>> privilege would be a good thing. But bolting one on now is likely
>> to create more problems than it fixes. Particularly since it doesn't
>> actually fix any of the concrete problems enumerated in this thread.
>>
>> I continue to think that getting rid of the privilege check would be
>> a more useful answer than changing which privilege is tested.
> I wasn't suggesting that we test for TEMP instead of CREATE; what I
> meant was we would test for CREATE *OR* TEMP to give more options for
> management.
[ shrug... ] That's weird, ie unlike the behavior of other privileges,
and it *still* doesn't fix any of the problems Stephen complained of.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: