Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3481656.1648245290@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >> On 25 Mar 2022, at 19:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'd vote for changing the behavior of --table rather than trying to >> be bug-compatible with this decision. > Agreed. Question is what to do for "-t pg_class", should we still forbid > dumping system catalogs when they are pattern matched without wildcard or is > should that be ok? And should this depend on if "-n pg_catalog" is used? I don't think there's anything really wrong with just "we won't dump system objects, full stop"; I don't see much use-case for doing that except maybe debugging, and even that is a pretty thin argument. However, a possible compromise is to say that we act as though --exclude-schema=pg_catalog is specified unless you explicitly override that with "--schema=pg_catalog". (And the same for information_schema, I suppose.) This might be a bit hacky to implement :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: