Re: WAL Archiving and base backup
От | Mladen Gogala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL Archiving and base backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 347e4646-42d8-ab87-565d-be773c998e7f@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL Archiving and base backup (Issa Gorissen <issa-gorissen@usa.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 1/16/22 13:12, Issa Gorissen wrote: > > Just to avoid any misunderstanding. I am perfectly happy using the > backup/restore with pg_dump and we use it for at least a decade with > success for our need of backups. I am using pgbackrest. I used to use pg_rman, being well acquainted with rman backup tool belonging to another database system, but pg_rman was removing WAL archives before they were delivered to replica. I have replication slots from the OLTP database to the DW database with partitions, hash and bloom indexes and massive amount of processors, for parallel query. I need the replication to work. In addition to that, pgbackrest can employ parallelism while pg_rman cannot do that. I find pgbackrest by far the best Postgres backup system. -- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 https://dbwhisperer.wordpress.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: