Re: Proposal: Integrity check
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Integrity check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3479.1201287276@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Integrity check (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Integrity check
Re: Proposal: Integrity check |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> This seems like a pretty horrid idea. Bad pages shouldn't be allowed to >> get into shared buffers in the first place. Why not have the checking >> logic operate outside shared buffers? > It currently works outside the shared buffers, but I afraid about > collision due to parallel read and write access on one block. I'm not > sure if parallel write(8k) and read(8k) is synchronized by kernel/fs or > not. If not it should generates false positive results. If yes than I'm > happy :-) with outside processing. We're already assuming that; otherwise base backups for PITR don't work. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: