Re: libpq debug log
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq debug log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3455705.1617299197@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq debug log ("'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org'" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq debug log
Re: libpq debug log |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org'" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2021-Apr-01, Tom Lane wrote: >> BTW, what in the world is this supposed to accomplish? >> - (long long) rows_to_send); >> + (1L << 62) + (long long) rows_to_send); > It makes the text representation wider, which means some buffer fills up > faster and the program switches from sending to receiving. Hm. If the actual field value isn't relevant, why bother including rows_to_send in it? A constant string would be simpler and much less confusing as to its purpose. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: