Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34556.1620397798@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > 1. No wonder we could not reproduce it anywhere else. I've warned > the cfarm admins that their machine may be having hardware issues. I heard back from the machine's admin. The time of the crash I observed matches exactly to these events in the kernel log: May 07 03:31:39 gcc202 kernel: dm-0: writeback error on inode 2148294407, offset 0, sector 159239256 May 07 03:31:39 gcc202 kernel: sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11 May 07 03:31:39 gcc202 kernel: blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 157618896 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x4800 phys_seg16 prio class 0 So it's not a mirage. The admin seems to think it might be a kernel bug though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: