Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34491a4e-2664-6ea7-662c-b13d18d2a92d@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07.12.22 08:56, Michael Paquier wrote: > The location of the Nodes is quite invasive because we only care about > that for T_Const now in the query jumbling, and this could be > compensated with a third pg_node_attr() that tracks for the "int > location" of a Node whether it should participate in the jumbling or > not. The generation script already has a way to identify location fields, by ($t eq 'int' && $f =~ 'location$'), so you could use that as well. > There is also an argument where we would want to not include by > default new fields added to a Node, but that would require added more > pg_node_attr() than what's done here. I'm concerned about the large number of additional field annotations this adds. We have been careful so far to document the use of each attribute, e.g., *why* does a field not need to be copied etc. This patch adds dozens and dozens of annotations without any explanation at all. Now, the code this replaces also has no documentation, but maybe this is the time to add some.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: