Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style
Дата
Msg-id
3441172.1618369873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style (Noah Misch)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Noah Misch writes: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:26:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Attached are some draft patches to convert almost all of the >> contrib modules' SQL functions to use SQL-standard function bodies. >> The point of this is to remove the residual search_path security >> hazards that we couldn't fix in commits 7eeb1d986 et al. Since >> a SQL-style function body is fully parsed at creation time, >> its object references are not subject to capture by the run-time >> search path. > Are there any inexact matches in those function/operator calls? Will that > matter more or less than it does today? I can't claim to have looked closely for inexact matches. It should matter less than today, since there's a hazard only during creation (with a somewhat-controlled search path) and not during use. But that doesn't automatically eliminate the issue. >> I'd like to propose squeezing these changes into v14, even though >> we're past feature freeze. Reason one is that this is less a >> new feature than a security fix; reason two is that this provides >> some non-artificial test coverage for the SQL-function-body feature. > Dogfooding like this is good. What about the SQL-language functions that > initdb creates? Hadn't thought about those, but converting them seems like a good idea. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления