Add GUC to tune glibc's malloc implementation.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ronan Dunklau
Тема Add GUC to tune glibc's malloc implementation.
Дата
Msg-id 3424675.QJadu78ljV@aivenlaptop
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Add GUC to tune glibc's malloc implementation.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Add GUC to tune glibc's malloc implementation.  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Re: Add GUC to tune glibc's malloc implementation.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello, 

Following some conversation with Tomas at PGCon, I decided to resurrect this 
topic, which was previously discussed in the context of moving tuplesort to 
use GenerationContext: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/
8046109.NyiUUSuA9g%40aivenronan

The idea for this patch is that the behaviour of glibc's malloc can be 
counterproductive for us in some cases. To summarise, glibc's malloc offers 
(among others) two tunable parameters which greatly affects how it allocates 
memory. From the mallopt manpage:

       M_TRIM_THRESHOLD
              When the amount of contiguous free memory at the top of
              the heap grows sufficiently large, free(3) employs sbrk(2)
              to release this memory back to the system.  (This can be
              useful in programs that continue to execute for a long
              period after freeing a significant amount of memory.)  

       M_MMAP_THRESHOLD
              For allocations greater than or equal to the limit
              specified (in bytes) by M_MMAP_THRESHOLD that can't be
              satisfied from the free list, the memory-allocation
              functions employ mmap(2) instead of increasing the program
              break using sbrk(2).

The thing is, by default, those parameters are adjusted dynamically by the 
glibc itself. It starts with quite small thresholds, and raises them when the 
program frees some memory, up to a certain limit. This patch proposes a new 
GUC allowing the user to adjust those settings according to their workload.

This can cause problems. Let's take for example a table with 10k rows, and 32 
columns (as defined by a bench script David Rowley shared last year when 
discussing the GenerationContext for tuplesort), and execute the following 
query, with 32MB of work_mem:

select * from t order by a offset 100000;

On unpatched master, attaching strace to the backend and grepping on brk|mmap, 
we get the following syscalls:

brk(0x55b00df0c000)                     = 0x55b00df0c000
brk(0x55b00df05000)                     = 0x55b00df05000
brk(0x55b00df28000)                     = 0x55b00df28000
brk(0x55b00df52000)                     = 0x55b00df52000
mmap(NULL, 266240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x7fbc49254000
brk(0x55b00df7e000)                     = 0x55b00df7e000
mmap(NULL, 528384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x7fbc48f7f000
mmap(NULL, 1052672, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x7fbc48e7e000
mmap(NULL, 200704, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x7fbc4980f000
brk(0x55b00df72000)                     = 0x55b00df72000
mmap(NULL, 2101248, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x7fbc3d56d000

Using systemtap, we can hook to glibc's mallocs static probes to log whenever 
it adjusts its values. During the above queries, glibc's malloc raised its 
thresholds:

347704: New thresholds: mmap: 2101248 bytes, trim: 4202496 bytes


If we re-run the query again, we get: 

brk(0x55b00dfe2000)                     = 0x55b00dfe2000
brk(0x55b00e042000)                     = 0x55b00e042000
brk(0x55b00e0ce000)                     = 0x55b00e0ce000
brk(0x55b00e1e6000)                     = 0x55b00e1e6000
brk(0x55b00e216000)                     = 0x55b00e216000
brk(0x55b00e416000)                     = 0x55b00e416000
brk(0x55b00e476000)                     = 0x55b00e476000
brk(0x55b00dfbc000)                     = 0x55b00dfbc000

This time, our allocations are below the new mmap_threshold, so malloc gets us 
our memory by repeatedly moving the brk pointer. 

When running with the attached patch, and setting the new GUC:

set glibc_malloc_max_trim_threshold = '64MB';

We now get the following syscalls for the same query, for the first run:

brk(0x55b00df0c000)                     = 0x55b00df0c000
brk(0x55b00df2e000)                     = 0x55b00df2e000
brk(0x55b00df52000)                     = 0x55b00df52000
brk(0x55b00dfb2000)                     = 0x55b00dfb2000
brk(0x55b00e03e000)                     = 0x55b00e03e000
brk(0x55b00e156000)                     = 0x55b00e156000
brk(0x55b00e186000)                     = 0x55b00e186000
brk(0x55b00e386000)                     = 0x55b00e386000
brk(0x55b00e3e6000)                     = 0x55b00e3e6000

But for the second run, the memory allocated is kept by malloc's freelist 
instead of being released to the kernel,  generating no syscalls at all, which 
brings us a significant performance improvement at the cost of more memory 
being used by the idle backend, up to twice as more tps.

On the other hand, the default behaviour can also be a problem if a backend 
makes big allocations for a short time and then never needs that amount of 
memory again.

For example, running this query: 

select * from generate_series(1, 1000000);

We allocate some memory. The first time it's run, malloc will use mmap to 
satisfy it. Once it's freed, it will raise it's threshold, and a second run 
will allocate it on the heap instead. So if we run the query twice, we end up 
with some memory in malloc's free lists that we may never use again. Using the 
new GUC, we can actually control wether it will be given back to the OS by 
setting a small value for the threshold.

I attached the results of the 10k rows / 32 columns / 32MB work_mem benchmark 
with different values for glibc_malloc_max_trim_threshold. 

I don't know how to write a test for this new feature so let me know if you 
have suggestions. Documentation is not written yet, as I expect discussion on 
this thread to lead to significant changes on the user-visible GUC or GUCs: 
 - should we provide one for trim which also adjusts mmap_threshold (current 
patch) or several GUCs ?
 - should this be simplified to only offer the default behaviour (glibc's takes 
care of the threshold) and some presets ("greedy", to set trim_threshold to 
work_mem, "frugal" to set it to a really small value)

Best regards,

--
Ronan Dunklau

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Making empty Bitmapsets always be NULL
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add GUC to tune glibc's malloc implementation.