Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3422.1386221422@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Lazy people? I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to >> just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix. > Actually, I think it probably costs a fair portion of extension authors > when their initial code crashes because they forgot to declare all their > functions V1. I think it might actually be more of a bother to lazy > people than a benefit. Hm. We have heard one or two complaints like that, but not a huge number. I'm worried about breaking code that's been working since god-knows-when; but I will concede there's little evidence that there's very much of that out there either. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: