Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
| От | Alex Turner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 33c6269f0605301446m175a85bagb4071748ac8b4cc0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
SAS and SATA will give you the best throughput for your array total. U320 is limited to 320MB/channel.
Alex
Alex
On 5/30/06, Scott Marlowe < smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:28, Riccardo Inverni wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have to update a Linux box with PostgreSQL on it, essentially for
> data warehousing purposes. I had set it up about 3 years ago and at
> that time the best solution I had been recommended was to use SCSI
> disks with hardware RAID controllers.
>
> Is this still the way to go or things have recently changed? Any
> other suggestion/advice? What about SAN?
Actually, modern SATA server drives are now considered competitive with
the proper RAID controller.
Nowadays most people seem to recommend the Areca controllers. I haven't
used them myself, but would be happy to test them some day.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: