Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | Alex Turner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 33c6269f0511171150j24f2dd2bq607b69994338aa9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Just pick up a SCSI drive and a consumer ATA drive. Feel their weight. You don't have to look inside to tell the difference. Alex On 11/16/05, David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org> wrote: > > > I suggest you read this on the difference between enterprise/SCSI and > desktop/IDE drives: > > http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf > > > This is exactly the kind of vendor propaganda I was talking about > and it proves my point quite well : that there's nothing specific relating > to reliability that is different between SCSI and SATA drives cited in that > paper. > It does have a bunch of FUD such as 'oh yeah we do a lot more > drive characterization during manufacturing'. > > > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: