Re: pgsql: Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3396247.1709500489@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > And I think it's correct that this is somewhat bogus, or at least > confusing: the only way to have control back here on line 1371 after > having executed once is via the "goto retry" line below; and there we > release "prevlock" and set it to NULL beforehand, so it's impossible for > prevlock to be NULL. Looking closer I think this code is all confused, > so I suggest to rework it as shown in the attached patch. This is certainly simpler, but I notice that it holds the current LWLock across the line ptr = (MultiXactMember *) palloc(length * sizeof(MultiXactMember)); where the old code did not. Could the palloc take long enough that holding the lock is bad? Also, with this coding the "lock = NULL;" assignment just before "goto retry" is a dead store. Not sure if Coverity or other static analyzers would whine about that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: