Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3395490.1642177545@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes: > Like many I previously had to investigate a slowdown due to sub-transaction > overflow, and even with the information available in a monitoring view (I had > to rely on a quick hackish extension as I couldn't patch postgres) it's not > terribly fun to do this way. On top of that log analyzers like pgBadger could > help to highlight such a problem. It feels to me like far too much effort is being invested in fundamentally the wrong direction here. If the subxact overflow business is causing real-world performance problems, let's find a way to fix that, not put effort into monitoring tools that do little to actually alleviate anyone's pain. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: