Re: BUG #18445: date_part / extract range for hours do not match documentation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18445: date_part / extract range for hours do not match documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3332891.1713883193@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #18445: date_part / extract range for hours do not match documentation (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18445: date_part / extract range for hours do not match documentation
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/functions-datetime.html It would be a good idea to look at versions of the documentation that aren't so many years obsolete. 8.1 has been EOL since 2010. > We say that EXTRACT() should return a number between 0-23 for hours What it says now is The hour field (0-23 in timestamps, unrestricted in intervals) (This wording is currently only visible at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-EXTRACT but it will propagate into the website's copies of still-maintained branches at our next quarterly updates.) > The function seems to also return 24 in some cases eg: > SELECT date_part('hour', cast('24:00:00.00' as time))::int > Could we update the documentation or modify the function so that it wraps 24 > back to 0 hours? That edge case for type "time" is deliberate; see the definition of that type in table 8.9 here: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/datatype-datetime.html I don't really feel a need to clutter the documentation for EXTRACT() still more by mentioning it there, especially since the current wording is not wrong, just silent about that detail. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: