Re: Concurrent psql API
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrent psql API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3332.1207847057@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrent psql API (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > "Csaba Nagy" <nagy@ecircle-ag.com> writes: >> For interactive use in the above mentioned scenario you can use the >> 'screen' command and start as many psqls as needed > Sure, or you could just start multiple xterms or emacs shell buffers > (my preferred setup). Yeah, that's an awfully good point, and I have to admit I'd generally prefer multiple xterms too. > But I'm sure there are people who would prefer C-z too. AFAICT, supporting C-z will add a pretty significant increment of definitional complexity, implementation complexity, and portability risks to what otherwise could be a relatively small patch. I don't want to buy into that just because "some people might use it". I note also that if we start trapping C-z, it would stop working for what it works for now, namely suspending psql so you can do something else in that window. So, +1 for thinking about this entirely as a scripting feature. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: