Re: BEST odbc driver for windows MS Access
От | Richard Broersma Jr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BEST odbc driver for windows MS Access |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 332921.56034.qm@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BEST odbc driver for windows MS Access ("K. Kelly Close" <kkellyclose@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BEST odbc driver for windows MS Access
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> And if > not, will I have to go thru MSQuery to get to pgsql via ODBC? I hope not... I am not to sure how to answer your question. The functionality does MSQquery give you that you get some other way with OLEDB. > And if anyone has thoughts or > experience on OLEDB vs. ODBC for connecting to pgsql from Microsoft > software, I'd love to hear of them! My opionion of OLEDB for postgresql is that it is broken and certainly not more stable in this case. Even worse, there doesn't seem to be much support for the oledb project as compared with the odbc projects. If you find that a bug keeps you from completing your project, there aren't very many places to turn. from the following link: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2006-10/msg00009.php you see that an old version of ODBC was able to handle a load of 600 transactions requests per second. The Command Prompt odbc-ng appears to almost double this throughput, however it breaks when I try to use it. This should be expected since this driver is still released as being under the "public test mode". If you are enterested in using the odbc-ng driver you could use the following mailing list for help: http://lists.commandprompt.com/mailman/listinfo/odbcng Regards, Richard Broersma jr.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: