Re: Extension disappearing act
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extension disappearing act |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3318006a000e05360c487189bf8abe5c40732ce3.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Extension disappearing act (Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2025-06-19 at 15:09 +0200, Dominique Devienne wrote: > Hi. Little mystery we don't understand. v17. > > Create new DB, owned by dedicated new ROLE. > Create extension (pgcrypto) in our case. Installed in public, owned by > DB owner role. > Create schemas and populate them inside the DB. > This also creates roles associated to those schemas. > One of the schema is owned by the DB owner (in case that matters). > Creates functions using pgcrypto, in some of those schemas. > Drop all schemas (and associated roles), thus pgcrypto-using functins are gone. > Of course, the DB owner role was not dropped. Can't in fact. > Somehow, the pgcrypto extension has disappeared, as side-effects of the drops. > We did a LIBPQ trace of the command to does all the drops, > and there's no explicit drop of the extension. > > All of the above is done using a LOGIN role that has CREATEROLE and CREATEDB. > > Extensions are not supposed to implicitly disappear, are they? > Any idea, what we're missing, that might explain pgcrypto's disappearance? > We're stumped for now. So are we. Why do you keep us guessing instead of posting a reproducer? Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: