Re: partitioning using dblink
От | Scara Maccai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partitioning using dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 331494.11814.qm@web28108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | partitioning using dblink (Scara Maccai <m_lists@yahoo.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: partitioning using dblink
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> > >> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be > > >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a > > >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a > > >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and > > >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree. Is there a "specific" reason why views can't be part of an inheritance tree? I mean: it's that we "don't want" it or it would be just difficult to implement? ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: