Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 330a093a-d155-c866-cbf2-8f36fdf51e95@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/6/17 11:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/5/17 21:32, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: >> At Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:33:51 -0400, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in <5401fef6-c0c0-7e8a-d8b1-169e30cbd854@2ndquadrant.com> >>> After further thinking, I prefer the alternative approach of using >>> pq_sendcountedtext() as is and sticking the trailing zero byte on on the >>> receiving side. This is a more localized change, and keeps the logical >>> replication protocol consistent with the main FE/BE protocol. (Also, we >>> don't need to send a useless byte around.) >> >> I'm not sure about the significance of the trailing zero in the >> the logical replication protocol. > > It doesn't matter. It could be "nice" to have it because then the > receiving side doesn't need to add it if it wants to assemble a C > string. But for the reasons above, it doesn't seem worth doing that. committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: