Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
От | Mitch Pirtle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 330532b60411211334276bd3e8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Let's not confuse opinion with fact here. Whether you like fixed width or variable is opinion. Multicolumn text becoming unreadable when the column widths are not controlled is a fact. Anyone can design a layout that stretches to utilize all available screen real estate. But that doesn't mean that the aesthetics or usability remains constant as the layout dramatically changes - it either looks great at larger sizes (and lousy on small ones), or great on small sizes (and lousy on large ones). I personally don't have a preference, but can say there are some very, VERY intelligent people who have put a tremendous amount of time and effort in order to learn what does and does not work. Perhaps the pundits on C|Net or eWeek are the 'idiots' that you effortlessly categorize, but there are also professionals out there that have expertise that is significantly superior to anyone on this list. -- Mitch, knowing when his expertise reaches its limits (hint hint) On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:07:14 -0500, Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Thats because most "professionally-trained" designers are idiots when it comes > to web design. They want to create artwork like on TV's and magazines > (because what they really want to be are graphic artists), and they don't > understand that the web is a different medium. Different users have > different monitor sizes, and the view text in different font-sizes, and they > will even view the new website in different languagues. Anyone who has study > web usability will understand that trying to force your viewpoint of a design > on someone else just leads to trouble.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: