Re: v11.5- v15.3 upgrade (linux)
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: v11.5- v15.3 upgrade (linux) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 32e9a9a2-b7c4-4da3-95e3-d346e734833c@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | v11.5- v15.3 upgrade (linux) (David Gauthier <dfgpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/7/24 07:47, David Gauthier wrote: Please reply to list also. Ccing list > >>I would definitely read the release notes for 12.0, 13.0, 14.0 and 15.0. > Check ! None of the breaking changes affect me. > > >>How are and from where are you installing the Postgres package(s)? > IT does the installs. I'd have to check with them. > What would you recommend ? (again, linux installs) I would use the packaging system for whatever Linux distro you are on. In particular, if available, the community repos from here: https://www.postgresql.org/download/ They generally offer more choice of Postgres versions for a given distro version. > > >>.The would be plan 2 if installing the plperlu package is not possible > We do not want or need plperlu on the 15.3 DB Then you can skip installing that package, assuming you have cleared out all references to plperlu in the 11 instance. > > >> I would backup the 11.5 instance... > Absolutely. In fact, IT was planning on doing an 11.5 backup and > restore on 15.3. Unsure if restoring an 11.5 into a 15.3 is a wise > approach. Any thoughts on that? According to item below that was already tested and worked. Is that correct? > > >>The above is going to depend on the size of the database > Relative to what PG can do, this one is small (a few million > records/table tops). No partitioning. > > >>If you have the ability to do a test migration on a test machine > where oops are not a problem that would be way to verify the 2) and 3) > options. > Already done. He restored the 11.5 on 15.3 and I tested it. Works fine. So good to go, depending on extent of testing. > > I don't think I'll be able to sell the "3" option above to the IT > group. I think they'll want to do something simpler and with fewer steps. > So the question is... option 1 or 2 ? Or does it matter, either can work ? If it where me it would be 1) as that gives you a fallback provision to the original 11 instance. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: