Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 32b7fe66-f0e6-42e5-3c95-7d123e7d7f6d@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'?
Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |
Список | pgsql-pkg-yum |
On 2020-05-20 16:57, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> Sorry, I should have been more clear. The upstream default of the GUC >> parameter "password_encryption" is md5. > > Which, really, is pretty broken when we're going to be having our > packagers setting up pg_hba.conf to use scram- at the *very* least it's > ridiculously misleading because we're going to have SCRAM in pg_hba.conf > but passwords actually stored as md5 and therefore we won't be getting > the benefits from SCRAM auth (though it should still work, of course, > since the SCRAM mode will fall back to working with an md5 password). Devrim's commit to pgrpms did include a change to the default setting of password_encryption, so it appears to be correct as far as it goes. But this leads to other questions, like, what should pg_upgrade do? These discussions should be had, but perhaps not on the RPM packaging list the night before the release. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-pkg-yum по дате отправления: