Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3278464.1626198212@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index... (Ilmir Mulyukov <ilmir.mulyukov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index...
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Ilmir Mulyukov <ilmir.mulyukov@gmail.com> writes: > Laurenz, there is no index for this table. > ka_im_pg=# \d _inforg31440 > Table "public._inforg31440" > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default > ---------------+---------------+-----------+----------+--------- > _fld31441 | mvarchar(400) | | not null | > _fld31442 | mvarchar(10) | | not null | > _fld31443rref | bytea | | not null | > _fld2102 | numeric(7,0) | | not null | What in the world is type "mvarchar"? It's certainly not anything defined by core Postgres. I think you need to address this question to whoever wrote that datatype. It seems somewhat likely that this is intentional behavior for the type. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: