Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage

John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:11 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The patch does not apply successfully; please rebase the patch.

> There's a good reason for that -- the latest one was committed two
> weeks ago. The status should still be waiting on author, though,
> namely for:

> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 5:28 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Remaining things from this thread:
>> * removing --disable-thread-safety
>> * removing those vestigial HAVE_XXX macros (one by one analysis and patches)
>> * making Unix sockets secure for Windows in tests

I imagine we should just close the current CF entry as committed.
There's no patch in existence for any of those TODO items, and
I didn't think one was imminent.

            regards, tom lane