Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 32514125-2688-00c3-0210-44a467dd0470@timescale.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/26/22 06:29, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > Please find attached V4 taking care of Jacob's previous comments. > + /* > + * InitializeSystemUser should already be called once we are sure that > + * authn_id is not NULL (means auth_method is actually valid). > + * But keep the test here also for safety. > + */ > + if (authn_id) Since there are only internal clients to the API, I'd argue this makes more sense as an Assert(authn_id != NULL), but I don't think it's a dealbreaker. > As far the assertion failure mentioned by Michael when moving the > SVFOP_SYSTEM_USER from NAMEOID to TEXTOID: V4 is assuming that it is > safe to force the collation to C_COLLATION_OID for SQLValueFunction > having a TEXT type, but I would be happy to also hear your thoughts > about it. Unfortunately I don't have much to add here; I don't know enough about the underlying problems. Thanks, --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: