Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 32468.1500498091@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> writes: > Here are the list of macros and variables from 'intrpvar.h' file that > are just defined in perl module but not in plperl on Windows, > #ifdef PERL_USES_PL_PIDSTATUS > PERLVAR(I, pidstatus, HV *) /* pid-to-status mappings for waitpid */ > #endif > #ifdef PERL_SAWAMPERSAND > PERLVAR(I, sawampersand, U8) /* must save all match strings */ > #endif I am really suspicious that this means your libperl was built in an unsafe fashion, that is, by injecting configuration choices as random -D switches in the build process rather than making sure the choices were recorded in perl's config.h. As an example, looking at the perl 5.24.1 headers on a Fedora box, it looks to me like PERL_SAWAMPERSAND could only get defined if PERL_COPY_ON_WRITE were not defined, and the only way that that can happen is if PERL_NO_COW is defined, and there are no references to the latter anyplace except in this particular #if defined test in perl.h. Where did your perl installation come from, anyway? Are you sure the .h files match up with the executables? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: