Re: [PERFORM] Bulk persistence strategy

Riaan Stander <rstander@exa.co.za> writes:
> I've come up with generating functions on the go, but I'm concerned about
> the performance impact of this. I first wanted to use an anonoumys code
> block, but then I cannot do parameter binding from npgsql.
> ...
> Is there a better way I'm missing and is "temp" function creation in
> Postgres a big performance concern, especially if a server is under load?

The function itself is only one pg_proc row, but if you're expecting
to do this thousands of times a minute you might have to adjust autovacuum
settings to avoid bad bloat in pg_proc.

If you're intending that these functions be use-once, it's fairly unclear
to me why you bother, as opposed to just issuing the underlying SQL
statements.

            regards, tom lane