Re: This script will crash the connection
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: This script will crash the connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3239.980533816@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: This script will crash the connection (Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: This script will crash the connection
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The problem here is that the query rewriter tries to hang the query's >> qualification (WHERE clause) onto the rule's action query, so that >> the action query won't be done unless the query finds at least one >> row to update. >> NOTIFY commands, being utility statements, don't have qualifications. >> In 7.0 and before, the qual clause just vanished into the ether, and >> so in this example the NOTIFY would execute whether the UPDATE updated >> any rows or not. In 7.1 there is physically noplace to hang the qual >> (no jointree) and thus a crash. > Would be something for a STATEMENT trigger. We don't have 'em > yet and I'm not sure what kind of information they will > receive if we finally implement them. But the number of rows > affected by the statement is a good candidate. That's no help for a 7.1 solution however. We can't start inventing a new feature at this stage. What I am inclined to do is have the rewriter reject conditional rules that contain NOTIFY. That seems like the minimal restriction that will prevent a crash or incorrect behavior. Comments? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: