Re: How to fire triggers just on "top" level DML
От | A.M. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to fire triggers just on "top" level DML |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 32198913-CFE4-4426-A97A-D96587B3511F@themactionfaction.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How to fire triggers just on "top" level DML ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to fire triggers just on "top" level DML
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 19, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > We've been running for about ten years on a framework which fires > triggers similar to database triggers in a Java tier close to the > database, and we're now trying to convert these to actual PostgreSQL > database triggers. Our biggest hitch at the moment is that we > defined a class of triggers we called "top" triggers, which only > fire from DML submitted by the application, not from DML issued by > other triggers. > > One significant use of this is to block direct modification of > summary data (either selected columns or entire tables) which are > supposed to be trigger maintained. It's not immediately obvious how > to accomplish this within PostgreSQL, although I'm probably missing > something. We're not tied to any particular methodology -- a > TG_DEPTH variable, if it existed, would do fine, for example. > > Any suggestions? Most PLs include some session-specific storage. In PL/Perl, it is %_SHARED. Setting a flag there should do the trick. Ifyou are using a PL which does not have such a notion (like plpgsql), you can add a call in your triggers to a functionwritten in a PL which does support this. Alternatively, a C function which sets/checks a global flag would work aswell. Cheers, M
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: