Re: [PATCH] Add tab-complete for backslash commands
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add tab-complete for backslash commands |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3212818.1631045124@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [PATCH] Add tab-complete for backslash commands ("tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: [PATCH] Add tab-complete for backslash commands
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> writes: > On Sunday, September 5, 2021 1:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I particularly question why we'd offer both >> single- and multiple-character versions, as the single-character >> version seems entirely useless from a completion standpoint. > I generally agreed with your opinion. But I'm not sure if there's someone > who'd like to see the list of backslash commands and choose one to use. > I mean, someone may type '\[tab][tab]' to check all supported backslash commands. Sure, but he'd still get all the commands, just not all the possible spellings of each one. And a person who's not sure what's available is unlikely to be helped by an entry for "\c", because it's entirely not clear which command that's an abbreviation for. In any case, my main point is that the primary usage of tab-completion is as a typing aid, not documentation. I do not think we should make the behavior less useful for typing in order to be exhaustive on the documentation side. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: