Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3209109.1631040651@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2021-Sep-06, Laurenz Albe wrote: >> I agree with Greg that the current behavior is annoying and would >> welcome the change. This has bothered me before. > It has bothered me too. I'm not here to claim that the current behavior is perfect. However, AFAICT the patch as-presented breaks the principle that text goes into the history at the moment it's sent to the server. In particular, we might make an entry for text that *never* got to the server because you cleared the buffer instead. I don't find that to be an improvement. It breaks one of the primary use-cases for history, ie keeping a record of what you did. We could perhaps finesse that point by deciding that comment lines that are handled this way will never be sent to the server --- but I'm sure people will complain about that, too. I've definitely heard people complain because "--" comments are stripped from what's sent (so I'd look favorably on a patch to undo that). I think the questions around empty-line handling are largely orthogonal to this, and we'll just confuse ourselves if we discuss that at the same time. Likewise for M-#. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: