Re: relpages in pg_class
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: relpages in pg_class |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3203690.1660927195@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: relpages in pg_class (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: relpages in pg_class
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2022-Aug-19, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Well, blocks and pages are the same size, so I don't see the problem. > If you think about operating system "blocks" rather than Postgres > "blocks", I can see how this can be interpreted differently. I'm not > sure if this is a good place to make that distinction, though; I mean, > if we do, how many other places should we patch similarly? Yeah, we use "blocks" and "pages" interchangeably, which is something I don't feel a need to change; but evidently the OP didn't realize that. This is a job for the glossary, perhaps? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: