Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements
От | Tobias Bussmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31E54FA6-F54C-4EDA-8D39-E3F0FC6B297E@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am 18.11.2016 um 14:21 schrieb Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>: > But then the change to use CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK in tcop/postgres.c should > be reverted as well, because it breaks things just as bad: > > /* creates a parallel-enabled plan */ > PQprepare(conn, "pstmt", "SELECT id FROM l WHERE val = $1", 1, NULL); > /* blows up with "cannot insert tuples during a parallel operation" */ > PQexec(conn, "CREATE TABLE bad(id) AS EXECUTE pstmt('abcd')"); Great example of mixing a v3 prepare with an simple query execute. I didn't think about that while even the docs state clearly:"Named prepared statements can also be created and accessed at the SQL command level, using PREPARE and EXECUTE."Sticking with either protocol version does not trigger the error. > I think we should either apply something like that patch or disable parallel > execution for prepared statements altogether and document that. So we likely need to backpatch something more then a doc-fix for 9.6. Given the patch proposals around, this would eitherdisable a feature (in extended query protocol) or add a new one (in simple query protocol/SQL). Or would it be moreappropriate to split the patch and use CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK in prepare.c on master only? I'm asking in case there isa necessity to prepare a proposal for an documentation patch targeting 9.6 specifically. Best regards Tobias
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: