Re: Missed LIMIT clause pushdown in FDW API
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missed LIMIT clause pushdown in FDW API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31924.1459344783@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missed LIMIT clause pushdown in FDW API (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missed LIMIT clause pushdown in FDW API
Re: Missed LIMIT clause pushdown in FDW API |
Список | pgsql-general |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Alexander Reshetov > <alexander.v.reshetov@gmail.com> wrote: >> As far as I know there is no LIMIT clause pushdown in FDW API. >> Is there some reasons not to support LIMIT clause pushdown? It was impossible to do it before 3fc6e2d7f5b652b4, committed 3 weeks ago. Now that that infrastructure exists, someone might look into using it for this purpose ... but not before 9.7 at the earliest. > Working for me on 9.5 with postgres_fdw... Really? It's true that postgres_fdw won't fetch more rows than it actually needs from the remote --- but that's not the same as telling the remote planner to prefer a fast-start plan. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: