Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall
От | Greg Williamson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 318571.84487.qm@web46103.mail.sp1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall (APseudoUtopia <apseudoutopia@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi -- > I'm writing a backup script. Right now, I only have one database on my postgresql server. I'm > deciding if I should use pg_dump or pg_dumpall when backing up the server. As far as I can tell, > pg_dumpall cannot compress the dumps automatically and it only dumps data in the standard SQL > text file format. This means that I would not be able to use pg_restore to selectively restore the > database, correct? > > What is *NOT* included in a pg_dump that IS in pg_dumpall (Other than all the databases)? > Things like user-defined functions and datatypes? Roles? Views? The pg_dumpall gets users and groups that are not dumped in the single database versions; I used to use pg_dump on each of several databases on a given server and then pg_dumpall with suitable parameters to get only those bits and nothing else. User defined stuff, views etc. are all in a given database so they will be in the pg_dump. HTH, Greg Williamson
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: