Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 318.942970643@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> * Since no one has picked up on my idea to run the tests directly on the >> backend, I will keep reiterating this idea until someone shuts me up > Running the backend standalone does not use locking with other backends, > so it is dangerous. It wouldn't be particularly "dangerous" if we assume that no one else is accessing the regression database. What it *would* be is less useful at catching problems. Standalone mode wouldn't test the cross-backend interlocking code at all. Admittedly, running a bunch of tests serially isn't a strong stress test of cross-backend behavior, but it's not as content-free a check as you might think. On my machine, at least, the old backend is still around doing shutdown for the first half-second or so while the next one is running. What I'd really like to see is some deliberate parallelism in some of the regress tests... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: