Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3177834d-8313-c641-2d20-f99d69d8b6ff@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-07-23 17:30, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > The reason for moving is that we print default values in usage(), and that > requires the value to be computed before calling usage(). We already do this > for resolving environment values in parseCommandLine(). If we do it in setup, > then we’d have to split out resolving the new_cluster.bindir into it’s own > function exposed to option.c, or do you have any other suggestions there? I think doing nontrivial work in order to print default values in usage() is bad practice, because in unfortunate cases it would even prevent you from calling --help. Also, in this case, it would probably very often exceed the typical line length of --help output and create some general ugliness. Writing something like "(default: same as this pg_upgrade)" would probably achieve just about the same. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: