Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31684.1481643109@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6? (Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?
Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6? Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6? |
Список | pgsql-general |
=?UTF-8?Q?Torsten_F=C3=B6rtsch?= <tfoertsch123@gmail.com> writes: > postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)), j(y) as (values (2::int)) select > x from (select x from i union all select y from j) b; > x > --- > 1 > 2 > (2 rows) > postgres=# with i(x) as (values (1::int)), j(y) as (values (2::int)) select > max(x) from (select x from i union all select y from j) b; > ERROR: could not find plan for CTE "i" Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as expected before 9.5. No idea offhand what broke it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: