Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version

"Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:
> There appear to have been changes in the shared library libpq.
> Since the library has changed, it needs to have a new version number.

You're right, we need to bump the number before release (and I hope we
remember!).  Past practice has not been to bump the number during
development cycles, since we'd shortly have ridiculously high version
numbers if we incremented them at every development change.

libpq++ has also had API changes requiring a new version number before
release, I think --- any others?
        regards, tom lane