Re: jsonb_delete not documented
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonb_delete not documented |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31520.1449460155@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jsonb_delete not documented (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonb_delete not documented
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I see. The reference from pg_operator to pg_proc is by OID rather than > function name, so I didn't find them. Is that because the function is > overloaded? Yeah, I suppose so --- regproc can't resolve overloaded function names. > It's kind of odd that these are the only operators (at > first glance) that are set up like that. I think the customary thing when creating functions meant as operator support is to give them unique names. These weren't done that way ... I wasn't involved, but I wonder whether there was uncertainty as to whether these should be documented as functions or operators. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: