Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31500.1424634788@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org> writes: > Giuseppe Sacco wrote: >> Another important fact is about large objects, if you happen to use >> them: their OID is not just unique to the database, but to the whole >> cluster. This means that when you move a database in a cluster from a >> production system to a database on a test cluster, you may get errors >> when same OID already exists in target cluster (even if it is used in a >> different database). > Well, I'm doing this frequently and it doesn't cause any error. That's because the above claim is nonsense. pg_largeobject is not shared across databases of a cluster. You could well have collisions against large objects in the same database, though, if you're adding more large objects to an existing database and expecting to preserve their OIDs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: