Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
От | Andrey Borodin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3130B767-FEB7-4F18-AE90-DD95B4367316@yandex-team.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 8 апр. 2021 г., в 17:22, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> написал(а): > > Thanks! I chickened out of committing a buffer replacement algorithm > patch written 11 hours before the feature freeze, but I also didn't > really want to commit the GUC patch without that. Ahh, if only we'd > latched onto the real problems here just a little sooner, but there is > always PostgreSQL 15, I heard it's going to be amazing. Moved to next > CF. Hi Thomas! There's feature freeze approaching again. I see that you are working on moving SLRUs to buffer pools, but it is not clearto which PG version it will land. And there is 100% consensus that first patch is useful and helps to prevent big issues.Maybe let's commit 1'st step without lifting default xact_buffers limit? Or 1st patch as-is with any simple techniquethat prevents linear search in SLRU buffers. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: