Re: Lower priority of the configure option --with-libraries causes wrong lib resolution
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lower priority of the configure option --with-libraries causes wrong lib resolution |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 311720.1750019161@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Lower priority of the configure option --with-libraries causes wrong lib resolution (Charles Samborski <demurgos@demurgos.net>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Charles Samborski <demurgos@demurgos.net> writes: > Swapping the two flags so the order is `-L/postgres-deps/lib -L/usr/lib` > fixes the build. I consider it very surprising that that libraries > passed with `--with-libraries` have lower priority, I would expect > explicitly requested libraries to have the highest priority. Ugh. > First, `/usr/lib` is added in the clang configuration [1]. It is > retrieved from `/usr/bin/llvm-config --ldflags`. I would pin the blame here. This code should not be messing with the global LDFLAGS. -L switches from llvm-config should probably go into LLVM_LIBS instead, so that they're only applied while linking llvmjit.so. (Compare the handling of -L switches from python or perl: those go into python_libspec or perl_embed_ldflags, they're not applied globally.) Can you check whether a change along that line fixes the problem in your environment? > My workaround is to update the configure script to instead prepend > `LIBDIRS` at the start of `LDFLAGS` using `LDFLAGS="$LIBDIRS $LDFLAGS"`. I don't think we'd accept that: it seems about as likely to break builds as fix them. Notably, users might've themselves modified LDFLAGS to contain -L switches. While that's not good practice IMO, we shouldn't make changes that are more sweeping than necessary. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: